| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
17/04/2024 |
|
Actualizado : |
17/04/2024 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
JURBURG, S.D.; ÁLVAREZ BLANCO, M.J.; CHATZINOTAS, A.; KAZEM, A.; KÖNIG-RIES, B.; BABIN, D.; SMALLA, K.; CERECETTO, V.; FERNANDEZ-GNECCO, G.; COVACEVICH, F.; VIRUEL, E.; BERNASCHINA, Y.; LEONI, C.; GARAYCOCHEA, S.; TERRA, J.A.; FRESIA, P.; FIGUEROLA, E.L.M.; WALL, L.G.; COVELLI, J.M.; AGNELLO, A.C.; NIETO, E.E.; FESTA, S.; DOMINICI, L.E,; ALLEGRINI, M.; ZABALOY, M.C.; MORALES, M.E.; ERIJMAN, L.; CONIGLIO, A´.; CASSÁN, F.D.; NIEVAS, S.; ROLDÁN, D.M.; MENES, R.; VAZ JAURI, P.; MARRERO, C.S.; MASSA, A.M.; REVETRIA, M.A.M.; FERNÁNDEZ-SCAVINO, A.; PEREIRA-MORA, L.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; FRENE, J.P. |
|
Afiliación : |
STEPHANIE D. JURBURG, Department of Applied Microbial Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, 04318, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany; MARÍA J. ÁLVAREZ BLANCO, Department of Applied Microbial Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, 04318, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany; ANTONIS CHATZINOTAS, Dept. Applied Microbial Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Institute Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; ANAHITA KAZEM, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Thüringen, Jena, Germany; BIRGITTA KÖNIG-RIES, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Thüringen, Jena, Germany; DOREEN BABIN, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, 38104, Germany; KORNELIA SMALLA, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, 38104, Germany; MARÍA VICTORIA CERECETTO GONZÁLEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, 38104, Germany; GABRIELA FERNANDEZ-GNECCO, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, 38104, Germany; INBIOTEC-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Mar del Plata, Argentina; FERNANDA COVACEVICH, INBIOTEC-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Mar del Plata, Argentina; INTA, EEA Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Balcarce, Argentina; EMILCE VIRUEL, Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido (IIACS), Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CIAP), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Tucumán, Argentina; YESICA STEFANIA BERNASCHINA CORREA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SILVIA RAQUEL GARAYCOCHEA SOLSONA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO FRESIA, Unidad Mixta UMPI, Institut Pasteur Montevideo + INIA, Montevideo, Uruguay; EVA LUCÍA MARGARITA FIGUEROLA, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina Instituto de Biociencias, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional, Departamento de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Celular, Facu; LUIS GABRIEL WALL, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Laboratorio de Bioquímica y Biología de Suelos, Centro de Bioquímica y Microbiología de Suelos, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; JULIETA MARIANA COVELLI, Laboratorio de Bioquímica y Biología de Suelos, Centro de Bioquímica y Microbiología de Suelos, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (UNQ), Buenos Aires, Bernal, Argentina; ANA CAROLINA AGNELLO, Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Fermentaciones Industriales (CINDEFI, CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina; ESTEBAN EMANUEL NIETO, Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Fermentaciones Industriales (CINDEFI, CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina; SABRINA FESTA, Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Fermentaciones Industriales (CINDEFI, CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, Argentina; LINA EDITH DOMINICI, Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Tecnología de Pinturas y Recubrimientos (CIDEPINT, CICPBA-CONICET-UNLP), La Plata, A; MARCO ALLEGRINI, Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS, CONICET-UNS), Buenos Aires, Bahía Blanca, Argentina; MARÍA CELINA ZABALOY, Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS, CONICET-UNS), Buenos Aires, Bahía Blanca, Argentina; Departamento de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS); MARIANELA ESTEFANÍA MORALES, Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS, CONICET-UNS), Buenos Aires, Bahía Blanca, Argentina; Departamento de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS); LEONARDO ERIJMAN, Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular, Dr Héctor N Torres' (INGEBI-CONICET)T, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular Dr Hé; ANAHI CONIGLIO, Laboratorio de Fisiología Vegetal y de la Interacción Planta Microorganismo (LFVIPM), Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiotecnológicas (INIAB-CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Río C; FABRICIO DARIO CASSÁN, Laboratorio de Fisiología Vegetal y de la Interacción Planta Microorganismo (LFVIPM), Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiotecnológicas (INIAB-CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional; SOFIA NIEVAS, Laboratorio de Fisiología Vegetal y de la Interacción Planta Microorganismo (LFVIPM), Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiotecnológicas (INIAB-CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Río Cua; DIEGO M. ROLDÁN, Departamento de Bioquímica y Genómica Microbianas, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable (IIBCE), Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, Montevideo, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Ecología Micr; RODOLFO MENES, Laboratorio de Ecología Microbiana Medioambiental, Facultad de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Microbiología, Unidad Asociada del; PATRICIA VAZ JAURI, Laboratorio de Microbiología de Suelos, Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Interacción Plan; CARLA SILVA MARRERO, Laboratorio de Microbiología de Suelos, Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay; ADRIANA MONTAÑEZ MASSA, Laboratorio de Microbiología de Suelos, Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay; MARÍA ADELINA MOREL REVETRIA, Laboratorio de Microbiología de Suelos, Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay; ANA FERNÁNDEZ-SCAVINO, Laboratorio de Ecología Microbiana y Microbiología Ambiental, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (UdelarR), Montevideo, Uruguay; LUCIANA PEREIRA-MORA, Laboratorio de Ecología Microbiana y Microbiología Ambiental, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (UdelarR), Montevideo, Uruguay; SOLEDAD MARTÍNEZ, Laboratorio de Biotecnología, Departamento de Biociencias, Unidad de Análisis de Agua, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay; JUAN PABLO FRENE, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom. |
|
Título : |
Datathons: fostering equitability in data reuse in ecology. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Science & Society. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Trends in Microbiology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2024.02.010 -- OPEN ACCESS [Article in Press] |
|
ISSN : |
0966-842X |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.tim.2024.02.010 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Available online 21 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Jurburg, S.D.; Department of Applied Microbial Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany; email:s.d.jurburg@gmail.com -- LICENSE: Article under a Creative Commons license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) -- |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Approaches to rapidly collecting global biodiversity data are increasingly important, but biodiversity blind spots persist. We organized a three-day Datathon event to improve the openness of local biodiversity data and facilitate data reuse by local researchers. The first Datathon, organized among microbial ecologists in Uruguay and Argentina assembled the largest microbiome dataset in the region to date and formed collaborative consortia for microbiome data synthesis. © 2024 The Author(s) |
|
Palabras claves : |
ÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA; ÁREA MEJORAMIENTO GENÉTICO Y BIOTECNOLOGÍA VEGETAL - INIA; DATATHONS; SISTEMA ARROZ-GANADERÍA - INIA; SISTEMA VEGETAL INTENSIVO - INIA; The Datathon 2022 Consortium. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966842X24000507/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02820naa a2200697 a 4500
001 1064595
005 2024-04-17
008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0966-842X
024 7 $a10.1016/j.tim.2024.02.010$2DOI
100 1 $aJURBURG, S.D.
245 $aDatathons$bfostering equitability in data reuse in ecology.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2024
500 $aArticle history: Available online 21 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Jurburg, S.D.; Department of Applied Microbial Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany; email:s.d.jurburg@gmail.com -- LICENSE: Article under a Creative Commons license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) --
520 $aABSTRACT.- Approaches to rapidly collecting global biodiversity data are increasingly important, but biodiversity blind spots persist. We organized a three-day Datathon event to improve the openness of local biodiversity data and facilitate data reuse by local researchers. The first Datathon, organized among microbial ecologists in Uruguay and Argentina assembled the largest microbiome dataset in the region to date and formed collaborative consortia for microbiome data synthesis. © 2024 The Author(s)
653 $aÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA
653 $aÁREA MEJORAMIENTO GENÉTICO Y BIOTECNOLOGÍA VEGETAL - INIA
653 $aDATATHONS
653 $aSISTEMA ARROZ-GANADERÍA - INIA
653 $aSISTEMA VEGETAL INTENSIVO - INIA
653 $aThe Datathon 2022 Consortium
700 1 $aÁLVAREZ BLANCO, M.J.
700 1 $aCHATZINOTAS, A.
700 1 $aKAZEM, A.
700 1 $aKÖNIG-RIES, B.
700 1 $aBABIN, D.
700 1 $aSMALLA, K.
700 1 $aCERECETTO, V.
700 1 $aFERNANDEZ-GNECCO, G.
700 1 $aCOVACEVICH, F.
700 1 $aVIRUEL, E.
700 1 $aBERNASCHINA, Y.
700 1 $aLEONI, C.
700 1 $aGARAYCOCHEA, S.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aFRESIA, P.
700 1 $aFIGUEROLA, E.L.M.
700 1 $aWALL, L.G.
700 1 $aCOVELLI, J.M.
700 1 $aAGNELLO, A.C.
700 1 $aNIETO, E.E.
700 1 $aFESTA, S.
700 1 $aDOMINICI, L.E,
700 1 $aALLEGRINI, M.
700 1 $aZABALOY, M.C.
700 1 $aMORALES, M.E.
700 1 $aERIJMAN, L.
700 1 $aCONIGLIO, A´.
700 1 $aCASSÁN, F.D.
700 1 $aNIEVAS, S.
700 1 $aROLDÁN, D.M.
700 1 $aMENES, R.
700 1 $aVAZ JAURI, P.
700 1 $aMARRERO, C.S.
700 1 $aMASSA, A.M.
700 1 $aREVETRIA, M.A.M.
700 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ-SCAVINO, A.
700 1 $aPEREIRA-MORA, L.
700 1 $aMARTÍNEZ, S.
700 1 $aFRENE, J.P.
773 $tTrends in Microbiology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2024.02.010 -- OPEN ACCESS [Article in Press]
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
22/02/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
22/02/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CABRERA, D.; RODRIGUEZ, P.; UBERTI, A.; ZOPPOLO, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
CARLOS DANILO CABRERA BOLOGNA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ BRUNO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. UBERTI, Federal University of Fronteira Sul - UFFS, Chapeco?, Brazil; ROBERTO JOSE ZOPPOLO GOLDSCHMIDT, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Williams pear (Pyrus communis L.) productivity and fruit quality, grafted onto different rootstocks. [Conference paper] |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Acta Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 523-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.71 |
|
ISSN : |
0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic) |
|
DOI : |
10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.71 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
'Williams', the most cultivated pear (Pyrus communis) in Uruguay, was grafted on: three P. communis rootstocks (OH×F333, OH×F51, OH×F97); one P. calleryana (D6); and two Cydonia oblonga (quince) rootstocks (BA29 and EMC). To evaluate the performance of these combinations in southern Uruguay, trees were planted in 1998 at the INIA Las Brujas. The crops considered in this report were from 2014 to 2018. Productivity was evaluated as well as average fruit weight, firmness, diameter, soluble solids, and number of fruits. The different rootstocks evaluated had no influence on fruit diameter, firmness and soluble solids. Average fruit weight from trees on the quince rootstock EMC had the highest value in the first three seasons while fruits from trees on OH×F51 had the lowest fruit weight during the same period. Productivity of OH×F333, OH×F51 and OH×F97 was higher in the 2013/14 and 2016/17 seasons than with the quince stocks. These seasons were years of good precipitation and cold units. However, in seasons of unsuitable climatic conditions, the quince BA29 rootstock was superior in productivity showing higher stability among years. The main concern for quince rootstocks was high rate of plant death which occurred, possibly due to incompatibility which could be solved with an interstem. These results point to the need for further research to identify the best rootstock and interstock combination which will achieve maximum pear production potential under Uruguayan conditions.
@ International Society for Horticultural Science. MenosAbstract:
'Williams', the most cultivated pear (Pyrus communis) in Uruguay, was grafted on: three P. communis rootstocks (OH×F333, OH×F51, OH×F97); one P. calleryana (D6); and two Cydonia oblonga (quince) rootstocks (BA29 and EMC). To evaluate the performance of these combinations in southern Uruguay, trees were planted in 1998 at the INIA Las Brujas. The crops considered in this report were from 2014 to 2018. Productivity was evaluated as well as average fruit weight, firmness, diameter, soluble solids, and number of fruits. The different rootstocks evaluated had no influence on fruit diameter, firmness and soluble solids. Average fruit weight from trees on the quince rootstock EMC had the highest value in the first three seasons while fruits from trees on OH×F51 had the lowest fruit weight during the same period. Productivity of OH×F333, OH×F51 and OH×F97 was higher in the 2013/14 and 2016/17 seasons than with the quince stocks. These seasons were years of good precipitation and cold units. However, in seasons of unsuitable climatic conditions, the quince BA29 rootstock was superior in productivity showing higher stability among years. The main concern for quince rootstocks was high rate of plant death which occurred, possibly due to incompatibility which could be solved with an interstem. These results point to the need for further research to identify the best rootstock and interstock combination which will achieve maximum pear production potential under Uruguayan condit... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CLIMATIC CONDITION; Incompatibility; OH×F,; URUGUAY. |
|
Thesagro : |
CYDONIA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02625naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1061749
005 2021-02-22
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic)
024 7 $a10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.71$2DOI
100 1 $aCABRERA, D.
245 $aWilliams pear (Pyrus communis L.) productivity and fruit quality, grafted onto different rootstocks. [Conference paper]$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein.
520 $aAbstract: 'Williams', the most cultivated pear (Pyrus communis) in Uruguay, was grafted on: three P. communis rootstocks (OH×F333, OH×F51, OH×F97); one P. calleryana (D6); and two Cydonia oblonga (quince) rootstocks (BA29 and EMC). To evaluate the performance of these combinations in southern Uruguay, trees were planted in 1998 at the INIA Las Brujas. The crops considered in this report were from 2014 to 2018. Productivity was evaluated as well as average fruit weight, firmness, diameter, soluble solids, and number of fruits. The different rootstocks evaluated had no influence on fruit diameter, firmness and soluble solids. Average fruit weight from trees on the quince rootstock EMC had the highest value in the first three seasons while fruits from trees on OH×F51 had the lowest fruit weight during the same period. Productivity of OH×F333, OH×F51 and OH×F97 was higher in the 2013/14 and 2016/17 seasons than with the quince stocks. These seasons were years of good precipitation and cold units. However, in seasons of unsuitable climatic conditions, the quince BA29 rootstock was superior in productivity showing higher stability among years. The main concern for quince rootstocks was high rate of plant death which occurred, possibly due to incompatibility which could be solved with an interstem. These results point to the need for further research to identify the best rootstock and interstock combination which will achieve maximum pear production potential under Uruguayan conditions. @ International Society for Horticultural Science.
650 $aCYDONIA
653 $aCLIMATIC CONDITION
653 $aIncompatibility
653 $aOH×F,
653 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, P.
700 1 $aUBERTI, A.
700 1 $aZOPPOLO, R.
773 $tActa Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 523-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.71
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
